      
   4.9146 reviews

Will Amended Federal Rules Help or Harm Plaintiffs in Class Actions?

Request a Case Review

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer, Graifman, Perlmutter & Carballo, P.C.

10b9db026d89119e951a851045ac17eee7784f79

Written/Reviewed By:

Barry S. Kantrowitz, Esq.

Last Updated: Jul 22, 2026

Read Time: 3 mins

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are the regulations that govern discovery (among other matters) in federal court. Discovery is the exchange of evidence and is often a source of disputes between plaintiffs and defendants in civil litigation. For example, what is the proper scope of discovery? Who will pay for the production? Can one party have the other pay for discovery production when it is overly broad or excessive?

The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules reviews and amends these rules every few years, and offers new, proposed rules for attorneys comment and feedback. The latest proposed rules have not been free of criticism, as displayed in an article by Arthur H. Bryant of The National Review that can be viewed by clicking here.

The article reflected on three basic points:

The committee backed off numerically limiting discovery after outcry by attorneys reviewing the proposed changes. The committee will continue with Rule 26(c)(1) as written, that each party is generally responsible for their own discovery production costs.
The committee still is attempting to move forward with emphasizing “proportionality” and “cost-shifting” in discovery, which may result in a more narrow scope of discovery in practice.
The article notes that language matters. “Civil procedure” is not simple rules and regulations; civil procedure greatly impacts the substance of cases.

Plaintiffs in class action lawsuits are already pegged as David against Goliath, and it is important that the discovery process remain broad in scope to uncover relevant information. Cost-shifting and reducing the scope of discovery in civil litigation may help the Goliath, the large corporate defendants, at the cost to David, the injured individuals. The courtroom ideally seeks to level this imbalance of power, and we must have rules and procedures in place to forward this goal.

What do you think about these proposals? Keep in mind, counsel typically advances the expenses incurred on behalf of a plaintiff and the legal fees are paid on a contingency basis in class action cases. This means that if you have a potential case, there is no reason not to contact an attorney.

KGG’s Gary S. Graifman, is a member of the Public Justice National Case Development Special Projects Committee. Graifman is our lead class action litigation attorney for national cases involving defective medical devices, dangerous pharmaceutical drugs, securities and shareholder litigation and automotive recalls.

To speak to us about a potential class action case, call (866) 971-0927 or fill out our online contact form. You should hold corporations and companies liable if you have been wronged.

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer, Graifman, Perlmutter & Carballo, P.C. – Class Action Lawyers

Why Trust Us?

150+ Reviews

50+ Years of Service

Full-Service Law Firm

Client Reviews

    
 
 
      Posted on Google  
   LWelsh 
 8 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Clever and efficient.
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Kenny Perlow 
 29 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. KGG Law, and Barry Kantrowitz in particular, set the bar high for what a thorough, practical, strategic, compassionate and smart lawyer can be. Everything about Barry's advice and representation was exemplary and the stress mitigation that resulted was invaluable. On top of that, the ultimate result Barry achieved was beyond what was reasonable to expect and we are forever grateful. Often, people say that you hire a lawyer to prevent a problem. Sometimes, unfortunately, you need an attorney to solve a problem and I could not recommend Barry and his firm any more highly in that regard.
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Aliza Ali 
 93 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. My dad had a great experience with this law firm. From the very beginning, the team was professional, knowledgeable, and always willing to answer our questions. They kept us informed throughout the entire process and made what could have been a very stressful situation much easier to handle. We truly appreciated their dedication, honesty, and hard work. Thanks to their support, my dad felt confident every step of the way. We are very grateful for everything they did and would highly recommend this firm to anyone looking for reliable legal representation.
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Jana Montero 
 96 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I had a wonderful experience working with Sam Smith. He was very responsive, thorough, and easy to work with from start to finish. He walked me through everything clearly and made what started as a very stressful situation for me into something completely manageable. I would not hesitate to recommend him and the firm!
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Mike Sakmann 
 102 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I sought legal advice regarding an employment matter and had an excellent experience working with Sam Smith, Esq. at KGG Law. Sam was thorough, attentive, and took the time to listen carefully to my concerns before providing clear, thoughtful guidance. I appreciated the professionalism and care shown throughout the process, and I would confidently recommend KGG Law to anyone in need of legal assistance.
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Liz Hecker 
 108 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I can't say enough about this firm. They manage to comfort you during the whole legal process while staying professional and doing what is right. I would recommend them to anyone and also hire them again if I need legal help.
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Brandy Miller 
 131 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Kate is the best. She helped me very quickly, and was very attentive with all of my needs. So thankful for her
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Mike Greenspan 
 144 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Kate Carballo is a dedicated, passionate, and creative attorney whom I had the pleasure to lecture with at a state trial lawyer's conference. Kate's lecture demonstrated how she uses her innovative and "out-of-the-box thinking" to achieve outstanding results for her injured clients. That Kate is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a civil trial attorney is a testament to her skills, experience and commitment to excellence.
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Jonathan Sampson 
 151 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Was referred to KGG law by a friend and could not have asked for better legal representation. They walked me through every step of the process after my accident and began every call with “ how are you feeling” which was just one example of how much they care about their clients. They handled my case very efficiently, professionally and courteously. My attorney Kate Carballo was a rock star! So clearly experienced, she consistently made me feel at ease with the process. Highly recommend
  
 
     Posted on Google  
   Vinnie Kung 
 154 days ago
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. We had a great experience with the team at KGG Law. While it was a traumatic time for our family, they made it very easy for us and explained all of our options. They even performed due diligence to make sure that after our settlement, there would be no further issues which I think is even more important than the settlement itself. Thank you!

see all reviews

Will Amended Federal Rules Help or Harm Plaintiffs in Class Actions?

Why Trust Us?

Rockland County, New York

Bergen County, New Jersey