Written/Reviewed By:
Barry S. Kantrowitz, Esq.Last Updated: Sep 1, 2026
Read Time: 3 mins
In both New York and New Jersey, a driver who causes an accident and that driver’s insurance company will generally be responsible for paying the costs of the other driver’s property losses and injuries. The negligent driver, however, might try to minimize or eliminate his or her liability by claiming that due to sudden and unexpected circumstances that were not of their own making and that left them no time to react, i.e., an “emergency”, their actions were reasonable and prudent and, therefore, they should not be held responsible for an injured party’s costs and expenses.
If you were seriously hurt in a car accident, the at-fault driver may try to use the emergency doctrine to evade liability for your damages. An experienced law firm like Kantrowitz, Goldhamer, Graifman, Perlmutter & Carballo, P.C. can counter these arguments and gather evidence to show the true circumstances of the crash.
What kinds of emergencies are courts likely to consider?
New York and New Jersey courts will apply the emergency doctrine to reduce a negligent driver’s liability only under very limited circumstances, including:
- When a pedestrian is suddenly pushed into a roadway in front of the driver
- When the driver experiences a sudden medical event, such as a heart attack
- When the driver has to make a sudden maneuver to avoid another negligent driver
When car accident evidence shows that the driver could or should have anticipated a sudden event, the doctrine will not apply. A skilled car accident attorney can show how the evidence proves that, for example, the negligent driver was following too closely behind another vehicle or was driving too fast.
Does the emergency doctrine affect comparative negligence?
New York and New Jersey courts apply forms of comparative negligence to car crash cases such that the damages that an injured party can recover will be reduced in proportion to that party’s own contribution to the accident. Comparative negligence and the emergency doctrine are both functions of the specific facts in each case. A knowledgeable lawyer will scrutinize those facts to fight for the compensation that an injured party deserves to recover.
How New York’s 2026 Comparative Fault Rules Affect Your Claim
As of May 26, 2026, New York law bars a plaintiff found more than 50% at fault for a motor vehicle accident from recovering non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. The law also eliminated the “90/180-day” rule, under which a temporary injury lasting at least 90 of the 180 days following an accident could, on its own, qualify as a “serious injury” for purposes of filing a lawsuit. These changes apply to actions commenced on or after that date and affect how much compensation an injured driver can ultimately recover.
Call Kantrowitz, Goldhamer, & Graifman for a Free Consultation
The law firm of Kantrowitz, Goldhamer, Graifman, Perlmutter & Carballo, P.C. represent injured drivers and passengers in car accident lawsuits in Rockland and Bergen Counties and elsewhere in New York and New Jersey. We have successfully rebutted attempts by negligent drivers to escape liability by relying on the emergency doctrine. We will evaluate the facts in your case to fight for the largest available damages award that will compensate you for the full range of your losses and injuries.
Get in Touch
"*" indicates required fields
Posted on Google
LWelsh10 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Clever and efficient.Posted on Google
Kenny Perlow31 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
KGG Law, and Barry Kantrowitz in particular, set the bar high for what a thorough, practical, strategic, compassionate and smart lawyer can be. Everything about Barry's advice and representation was exemplary and the stress mitigation that resulted was invaluable. On top of that, the ultimate result Barry achieved was beyond what was reasonable to expect and we are forever grateful. Often, people say that you hire a lawyer to prevent a problem. Sometimes, unfortunately, you need an attorney to solve a problem and I could not recommend Barry and his firm any more highly in that regard.Posted on Google
Aliza Ali95 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My dad had a great experience with this law firm. From the very beginning, the team was professional, knowledgeable, and always willing to answer our questions. They kept us informed throughout the entire process and made what could have been a very stressful situation much easier to handle. We truly appreciated their dedication, honesty, and hard work. Thanks to their support, my dad felt confident every step of the way. We are very grateful for everything they did and would highly recommend this firm to anyone looking for reliable legal representation.Posted on Google
Jana Montero98 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a wonderful experience working with Sam Smith. He was very responsive, thorough, and easy to work with from start to finish. He walked me through everything clearly and made what started as a very stressful situation for me into something completely manageable. I would not hesitate to recommend him and the firm!Posted on Google
Mike Sakmann104 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I sought legal advice regarding an employment matter and had an excellent experience working with Sam Smith, Esq. at KGG Law. Sam was thorough, attentive, and took the time to listen carefully to my concerns before providing clear, thoughtful guidance. I appreciated the professionalism and care shown throughout the process, and I would confidently recommend KGG Law to anyone in need of legal assistance.Posted on Google
Liz Hecker110 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can't say enough about this firm. They manage to comfort you during the whole legal process while staying professional and doing what is right. I would recommend them to anyone and also hire them again if I need legal help.Posted on Google
Brandy Miller133 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Kate is the best. She helped me very quickly, and was very attentive with all of my needs. So thankful for herPosted on Google
Mike Greenspan146 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Kate Carballo is a dedicated, passionate, and creative attorney whom I had the pleasure to lecture with at a state trial lawyer's conference. Kate's lecture demonstrated how she uses her innovative and "out-of-the-box thinking" to achieve outstanding results for her injured clients. That Kate is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a civil trial attorney is a testament to her skills, experience and commitment to excellence.Posted on Google
Jonathan Sampson153 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Was referred to KGG law by a friend and could not have asked for better legal representation. They walked me through every step of the process after my accident and began every call with “ how are you feeling” which was just one example of how much they care about their clients. They handled my case very efficiently, professionally and courteously. My attorney Kate Carballo was a rock star! So clearly experienced, she consistently made me feel at ease with the process. Highly recommendPosted on Google
Vinnie Kung156 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We had a great experience with the team at KGG Law. While it was a traumatic time for our family, they made it very easy for us and explained all of our options. They even performed due diligence to make sure that after our settlement, there would be no further issues which I think is even more important than the settlement itself. Thank you!