Call Now
(866) 971-0927
![]()
4.9146 reviews
Defeat in Wal-Mart Case Does Not Spell the End for Class Action Lawsuits
Written/Reviewed By:
Barry S. Kantrowitz, Esq.Last Updated: Aug 31, 2026
Read Time: 3 mins
On June 20, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court announced a decision in the case Wal-Mart v. Dukes that was quickly hailed in the media as a big win for corporate interests and a defeat for class actions in general. But further review and discussion with class action lawyers show that the case may not have the impact that many thought it would.
The Wal-Mart case itself could certainly be called big. It involved claims on behalf of up to 1.5 million current and former female employees at Wal-Mart, who, according to the plaintiffs in the case, were discriminated against in promotions and pay because they were women.
The case turned on whether the trial court could certify the class — meaning whether the trial court was correct to say that the 1.5 million women who had worked at Wal-Mart since 1998 had enough in common to be represented together at trial.
Female Workers Not Allowed to Bring Wal-Mart Class Action
Pay at Wal-Mart stores is largely up to the manager’s discretion, and the plaintiffs in the case used statistics to show that overall, women received lower pay at the retail giant. However, Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, said that there was not enough of a connection between the 1.5 million women to certify them as a class.
Scalia rejected the statistical analysis offered, and then looked at the facts submitted to the trial court showing specific acts of workplace discrimination. He noted that more than half of the incidents came from just six states, and concluded that even if all the reports of discrimination are true, that doesn’t mean that there is a general policy of discrimination at the company.
Courts Must Look at the Facts of Class Action Cases
Immediately following the decision, many pundits speculated that this defeat would mean fewer class-action cases against large companies in the future. But in the weeks since, at least four other large employment class actions* have been certified by lower courts. The judges in those cases cited the Wal-Mart case but then demonstrated how it did not apply to the facts of the cases before them.
The longer-term takeaway from the Wal-Mart class action case may be the Court’s insistence on looking at the facts of the case in the early stages to determine whether to certify the class. Cases that attempt to use statistics to show discrimination (as this case did) may not do as well, but cases where the people affected all have something specific in common will continue to prove it is possible to bring a class action discrimination lawsuit against a large company.
* Including class actions involving Tyco International Ltd’s SimplexGrinnell (New York underpayment class action), Starbucks Corp. (overtime pay class action), C.R. England Inc. (truck company wage and hour class action) and HCR ManorCare (nursing home wage and hour class action).
Get in Touch
"*" indicates required fields
Posted on Google
LWelsh1 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Clever and efficient.Posted on Google
Kenny Perlow22 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
KGG Law, and Barry Kantrowitz in particular, set the bar high for what a thorough, practical, strategic, compassionate and smart lawyer can be. Everything about Barry's advice and representation was exemplary and the stress mitigation that resulted was invaluable. On top of that, the ultimate result Barry achieved was beyond what was reasonable to expect and we are forever grateful. Often, people say that you hire a lawyer to prevent a problem. Sometimes, unfortunately, you need an attorney to solve a problem and I could not recommend Barry and his firm any more highly in that regard.Posted on Google
Aliza Ali86 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My dad had a great experience with this law firm. From the very beginning, the team was professional, knowledgeable, and always willing to answer our questions. They kept us informed throughout the entire process and made what could have been a very stressful situation much easier to handle. We truly appreciated their dedication, honesty, and hard work. Thanks to their support, my dad felt confident every step of the way. We are very grateful for everything they did and would highly recommend this firm to anyone looking for reliable legal representation.Posted on Google
Jana Montero89 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a wonderful experience working with Sam Smith. He was very responsive, thorough, and easy to work with from start to finish. He walked me through everything clearly and made what started as a very stressful situation for me into something completely manageable. I would not hesitate to recommend him and the firm!Posted on Google
Mike Sakmann95 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I sought legal advice regarding an employment matter and had an excellent experience working with Sam Smith, Esq. at KGG Law. Sam was thorough, attentive, and took the time to listen carefully to my concerns before providing clear, thoughtful guidance. I appreciated the professionalism and care shown throughout the process, and I would confidently recommend KGG Law to anyone in need of legal assistance.Posted on Google
Liz Hecker101 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can't say enough about this firm. They manage to comfort you during the whole legal process while staying professional and doing what is right. I would recommend them to anyone and also hire them again if I need legal help.Posted on Google
Brandy Miller124 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Kate is the best. She helped me very quickly, and was very attentive with all of my needs. So thankful for herPosted on Google
Mike Greenspan137 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Kate Carballo is a dedicated, passionate, and creative attorney whom I had the pleasure to lecture with at a state trial lawyer's conference. Kate's lecture demonstrated how she uses her innovative and "out-of-the-box thinking" to achieve outstanding results for her injured clients. That Kate is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a civil trial attorney is a testament to her skills, experience and commitment to excellence.Posted on Google
Jonathan Sampson144 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Was referred to KGG law by a friend and could not have asked for better legal representation. They walked me through every step of the process after my accident and began every call with “ how are you feeling” which was just one example of how much they care about their clients. They handled my case very efficiently, professionally and courteously. My attorney Kate Carballo was a rock star! So clearly experienced, she consistently made me feel at ease with the process. Highly recommendPosted on Google
Vinnie Kung147 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We had a great experience with the team at KGG Law. While it was a traumatic time for our family, they made it very easy for us and explained all of our options. They even performed due diligence to make sure that after our settlement, there would be no further issues which I think is even more important than the settlement itself. Thank you!